1) Demonstrate an understanding of the social
networking technologies
To meet the above learning objective, I examined as part
of the INF506 learning package Blogs, tagging, Mashups, Wikis, photo and video hosting (Flickr & YouTube),
social networking platforms (Face book and Twitter), gaming and 3D virtual
worlds ( Second Life), VoIP and Web conferencing podcasting and RSS feeds &
aggregators.
My examination of RSS (Really Simple Syndication or Rich
Site Summary) in OLJ Task 1 revealed a web publishing that allows users to
collect timely updates of news and postings from newspapers, blogs,
libraries, audio, and video and read them in one place. The RSS feeds can be
read using a software called
an "RSS reader", "feed reader", or "aggregator",
which can be web-based, desktop-based, or mobile-device-based. RSS
takes the hassles out of staying up to date, by showing subscribers the latest
information that they are interested in. This makes RSS a great time saver
as the user does not have to go to each site they would be interested in just
to see if there was anything new.
2) Demonstrate an understanding of the concepts,
theory and practice of Library 2.0 and participatory library service.
Library 2.0 is about libraries and information
agencies harnessing not just Web 2.0 technologies but the underlying principles
of Web 2.0: collaboration, conversation, community and content creation (Hay et
al., 2012). In defining the essential
knowledge, skills and attributes of an information professional in a Web 2.0
world in OLJ Task 2, the concepts, theory and practice of Library 2.0 covered
on the first three modules of the course served as my guide. My definition include
the following skills and attributes: user focused, the ability to provide
information using Web 2.0 technologies, online searching expertise and
familiarity with research on assessment and evaluation, good collaborator and a
team player, interpersonal skills, ability to adapt to change, enthusiasm for
career-long learning, desire to share knowledge through teaching, good
communication skills in both written and oral, and appreciates the importance
of marketing program. The corresponding discussion of each of these skills and
attributes that I have pointed out in OLJ Task 2 covers the concepts, theory
and practice of Library 2.0 and participatory library service.
3) Critically examine the features and functionality of
various social networking tools to meet the information needs of users; and
4) Evaluate social networking technologies and software to
support informational and collaborative needs of workgroups, communities and
organisations
Referring to OLJ Task 2, one of the skills and attributes
of an information professional in a Web 2.0 world that I have included is the
ability to provide information using Web 2.0 technologies. A Web 2.0
information professional is a person who is aware and has fundamental
understanding of the Web 2.0 and emerging technologies and has the ability to
evaluate such technologies to find out if they are appropriate for
the workplace (Casell & Hiremath, 2011). Social networking
technologies help libraries connect with users and potential users “where they
are”, hence, Web 2.0 information professionals should possess the ability
to decide on the potential of using Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, Blogs, Wikis,
RSS, and others. In her article ‘What does it mean to be a Science Librarian
2.0?', Harvey (2009) emphasised some important points that serve as my guide when looking for the ‘right’ social networking tool to meet the information
needs of users. They are:
- Web and Library 2.0 is not about finding the next ‘new’ technology, but instead about finding the ‘right’ one;
- ensure that decisions to use new tools should only be made if they serve the purpose of helping in delivering services to users; and
- the patrons should be the driving force behind the decision on which tools make the best sense to employ (Harvey, 2009).
(Meeting these learning objectives is also demonstrated in
the case study submitted for this course).
5) Demonstrate an understanding of the social, cultural,
educational, ethical, and technical management issues that exist in a socially
networked world, and how information policy is developed and implemented to
support such issues.
OLJ Task 3 demonstrates my understanding of this learning
objective. The three articles that are required to read to answer the questions
in this task, have shown the different perspectives and concerns that encompass
social networking and policy. On one hand, Bryson’s ‘Managing information services: A transformational approach' helped me understand how policies are developed and implemented. Information
policies are developed and implemented to support different issues as social
networking and new technologies are adopted in organisations (including
libraries). They are guides to the decision-making process; their development
is an on-going process that evolves through continuous consultation with
stakeholders (Bryson, 2007).
On the other hand, the three OLJ articles (Mallan &
Giardina (2009); Harris (2010); Raynes-Goldie (2010)) show the existence of social,
cultural, educational, ethical, and technical management issues in a socially
networked world. It is then vital that these issues need to be taken into
account when developing a policy. In other words, information policy makers
must be aware of the intricacies associated with social networking sites to
ensure the policy actually fulfils its supportive function. Only when a clear information
policy is in place that questions such as “what can we share and what should we
retain as private to the online world?” or “can a librarian confirm a friend
request from a student in his/her library club?” can be answered.
References
Bryson, J. (2007). Chapter 10: Policy making. Managing information services: A
transformational approach (pp. 125-130). Burlington, VT: Ashgate e-Book.
[ebook] http://CSUAU.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=429668
Cassell, K. A., & Hiremath, U. (2011). Reference and information services in the
21st century: An introduction. New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
Harris, C. (2010). Friend me?: School policy may address
friending students online. School Library
Journal. Retrieved from http://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/article/CA6724235.html
Harvey, M. (2009). What does it mean to be a Science
librarian 2.0? Issues in Science and
Technology Librarianship, (Summer). Retrieved from
http://www.istl.org/09-summer/article2.html
Hay, L., Wallis, J., O’Connell, J. & Crease, R.
(2012). Social Networking for Information professionals [INF506 Module 3).
Retrieved January 21, 2013, from Charles Sturt University website: http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/INF506_201290_W_D/
page/84cf677e-ec91-4f08-8080-0f7dd953df21
page/84cf677e-ec91-4f08-8080-0f7dd953df21
Mallan, K., & Giardina, N. (2009). Wikidentities:
Young people collaborating on virtual identities in social network
sites, First Monday,14(6), (1 June 2009). Retrieved from
http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2445/2213
http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2445/2213
Raynes-Goldie, K. (2010). Aliases, creeping, and wall
cleaning: Understanding privacy in the age of Facebook, First Monday, 15(1),
(4 January 2010). Retrieved from
http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2775/2432